Moorish History and Science Academy

One of the biggest misconceptions (even on the part of Afrocentrics) is that the "Libyans" that Piankhi defeated when he established Kushite control of Kemet in... 750 bc, were the pale Libyans that lived on the coast of modern Libya. The pale coastal Asiatic-Libyans were not a power. The "Libyans" that reigned in Kemet before Piankhi were not the Asiatic Libyan colonists (called Tehenu and restricted to the barren coasts of modern Libya). The term Libyan was not used by the Kemetics, it is a newer term that referred to anywhere west of Kemet. It is only today that it refers specifically to modern Libya. The 23rd Dynasty "Libyans" were actually, according to Herodutus, from Tunisia (which later became Carthage). Herodutus' notes are conveniently ignored by Euro-Egyptologists because it establishes a pure African civilization in Carthage prior to the Phoenician (who were mixed with African, Dravidian, and Assyrian) immigration to Carthage. (note: Assyrian and Dravidian are Blacks with a dominant tendency for long narrow noses, wavy curls or straight hair, which, though existent in Afrakans, was not the dominant tendency) The Kemetics called northwest Afrakans "Meshwesh." This term became known in Europe as "Moorish."

*MIZRA'IM vs. Y'ISRAEL* "Alleged TimeLines & BloodLines ReVisited" Comparisons - Contrasts... Contraries - Contradictions *Mesh Wesh Kings* 1570 - 1075 B.C. <- 3rd Golden Age / 18th & 19th Dynasties 1065 - 722 B.C. <-- Kingdom of Israel / Saul-David-Solomon 721 - 656 B.C. <--- 4th Golden Age / 25th Dynasty 656 - 550 B.C. <--- Assyrian Babylonian Conquers Kemet S C H O L A R S H I P - S T U D Y Assyria - Ashar - Y'ashar'al - Israel Fact: What it meant to be an Assyrian had nothing to do with 'Race or Ethnicity'. Anyone could be accepted as an Assyrian as long as they worshiped the Assyrian God, "ASR or ASHUR" and paid homage to the Assyrian King. Assyria was a Religious Nation-State and Empire. Fact: What it means to be a Jew or Israeli has nothing to do with 'Race of Ethnicity'. Anyone can be accepted as an Israeli or Jew as long as you worship the Hebrew God of War, "Yahweh". Israel is a Religious Nation-State. Fact: Common English translation: God said to Moses, "I AM WHO I AM. This is what you are to say to the Israelites: 'I AM has sent me to you.'" (2 Exodus 3:14). Fact: In the Assyrian translation it is written "AHYH ASHR AHYH" (Syriac Bible 63DC, United Bible Societies, 1979 London). [I AM WHO I AM] = (English) [Abra Cad Abra] = (Aramaic) [ ] = ( Hebrew) ( = ASR) = Aleph, Shin, Resh = A-sh-ar The modern Hebrew (square) script is called "Ashuri", "Ashuri" is the Hebrew name for Assyrian, the name being used to signify the ancestor of the Assyrians, Ashur the son of Shem, the mythological son of Noah. Even the term Sabbath comes from the Assyrian word Sabatu, meaning "A day of rest for the heart." The Hebrew faith adopted this entire concept from Assyrians. Look it up. Assyrians and Greeks are responsible for Hebrew Israelites Folklore and as you venture closer to the light, the more clear it will become, Phoenician History has been replaced by Hebrew Folkore. The Septuagint was written during the Punic Wars. He who wins the war writes his/story. 8th century B.C. <- Greeks begin to colonize the Mediterranean. 8th century B.C. <- Greeks begin to venture into Western Asia. 738 B.C. <- Assyria captures 'Aram Damascus'. 721 B.C. <- Libyan MeshWesh Pharoah lose Lower Kemet. 721 B.C. <- Nubian Kushites recover Lower Kemet. 721 B.C. <- Assyria allegedly captures 'so-called' Israel. 700 B.C. <- Assyria still using 'Akkadian Cuneiform'. 700 B.C. <- Nubian Kushites 'Territory reaches Tyre'. 656 B.C. <- Ashurbanipal expels 'Nubians from Kemet'. 650 B.C. <- Assyrians adopts Aramaic as Lingua Franca. 650 B.C. <- Assyria Babylon adopts Kemetic Calendar. Take a moment soak it all in... Now let's begin to build. 1570 - 1075 B.C. <- 3rd Golden Age / 18th & 19th Dynasties 1065 - 721 B.C. <-- 2nd Intermediate period in Kemet 1065 - 721 B.C. <-- Kingdom of Israel / Saul-David-Solomon 721 - 656 B.C. <--- 4th Golden Age / 25th Dynasty The very first thing you have to notice is that their is no such thing as a King of Israel until 1065 B.C., which is approximately 10 years after the death of Ramses XI, concluding the 3rd Golden Age of the Kushite Pharaohs of Kemet who ruled the entire Mediterranean Coast of Western Asia. An intermediate period in ancient Kemetic history is a time when no one person or family ruled all of Kemet. Intermediate means to come in-between, in this case, between two kingdoms. During the first Intermediate Period, two families fought for control of Egypt. During this time, Egyptian scribes write about a time when there were, "70 kings in 70 days." This may seem to be an exaggeration, however, it tells of a time of unrest and a lack of continuous leadership. Nonetheless, Kemet had never lost territory without a recorded war or a recorded treaty. So why would the Empire give up the entire Levant due to the death of 1 single King? [The only answer is that they wouldn't and they didn't]. In truth, the Kemetic territory of the Levant was never lost, the 2nd intermediate period in which no one single person or family ruled all of Kemet had begun and if the Israelites had existed, then technically they would be considered Kings of Egypt / Kemet. Meditate on this: Enslaved for 400 years, begged to be freed, chased into the desert for 40 years, and then all of a sudden conquer a land without any type of war in the middle of the ancient Egyptian territory who's reigned ruled over and ranged from NUBIA to LEBANON (SYRIA). Do you realize how much military force the Egyptian Rulers had, for such a small population of renegade slaves to escape, never leave the territory, yet conquer one of it's regions with no repercussions? This is Biblical folklore, not documented historical data. Fiction, not fact. There is no evidence supporting such bold claims. In the Bible, it is said that the Israelites merely marched around Jericho 7 times and the walls miraculously fell down, then the Canaanites ran out of Palestine. Meaning, there couldn't have been any land acquired by the Habiru or Israelite, because from the period of the 'alleged Exodus till the occupation of Canaan', It is well documented that the Mediterranean Coastal territory of Western Asia belonged to the Rulers of Kemet. So the Hebrew Israelites basically never left out of Egypt. [Red Flag] However, the main focus here is, in 1065 B.C., according to Biblical Text, 1st Samuel ch.8 v.1-5, The Elders of Israel gathered together and came to Samuel and said to him, "Look, you're old, and your sons do not walk in your ways. Now make us a King to judge us like all the nations." Pay attention: Samuel was a Priest and acted as Vizier over Israel, exercising power and authority identical to the Amun-Priesthood of Kemet. It is said, because Samuel sons were wicked, is thee underlining and only reason why the Elders requested a King in 1065 B.C.. Meaning the Israelites elected it's first King approx. 10 years after the end of the Amarna Kings Golden Age, by chance. [Red Flag] The problem here is obvious. Requesting an Israelite King, not because the Kemetic Empire weakened and the territory of the Levant was fragmented and up for grabs, but strictly due to unrelated reasons indicates that the biblical account of His-Story strategically falls in line with the political power shifts in that particular region at that particular time, but the biblical account concerning relevant secular facts that would influence biblical history seems to be purposely omitted since these pertinent facts [regarding the 18th & 19th Dynasty Territory] will draw a contradicting conflict of interest for the Hebrew Folklore. The 22nd Dynasty King, Shoshenq is mentioned in 1st Kings ch.11 v.40, "Solomon therefore sought to kill [his son] Jeroboam. But Jeroboam arose and fled to Egypt, to Shishak, King of Egypt, and was in Egypt until the death of Solomon. <-- [Real People are referenced and used to support this mythologic literature as long as the secular facts are parallel and contrary working in favor, supporting the folklore.] The 25th Dynasty King, Taharqa is mentioned in 2 Kings ch.19 v.9, "And the King heard concerning Tirhakah, King of Ethiopia..." <--- [Notice he wasn't labeled the Pharaoh of Egypt, even though he was. This is because Biblical Text follow the Semitic Agenda of white washing Kemet and Mesopotamia.] Taharqa can be documented in the Bible as a King of Ethiopia, but never a Pharaoh of Egypt. The biblical account of History is unrealistic and can't be held accountable. The 6 Pharaonic Kings who really ruled the territory of Israel, at the same exact time as the mythological Saul, David & Solomon are well documented and have evidence of their existence present and accounted for. All 6 Kings ruled in succession with no interruption. They are known as the 20th & 21st MeshWesh Dynasty. Kings who ruled over Lower Kemet, that came from Libya. Under the Libyan Kings, The Greeks learned the Continent of Africa to be known as Libya. And under the Libyan Kings, 1070-721 b.c.e. the Greeks were granted access to Enlightenment in Kemet. Also, under the Libyan Kings, Assyria began to attack the territories of Lower Kemet, acquiring Aram Damascus, until the Nubian Pharaoh Piye of the 25th Dynasty took over Lower Kemet. If you continue to pay attention, you will learn that the Kingdom of Israel only existed between the 3rd & 4th Golden Ages of Kushitic Kemet. Simultaneously, as Nubia recovers the territory of Lower Egypt, which includes the Levant, Israel disappears into exile. It also needs to be noted that Solomon is just a fictional character. The Solomonic Lineage of 'Negus Negest', presents Solomon to be of more significance and importance than the Priesthood of Amun itself, (That which the concept of Solomon is derived from). This is just more Semitic myth & folklore brought to us by Asiatic Greeks 'Semites' attempting to overshadow substantial Kushite Heritage & Culture. These Semites manufactured these myths bringing the legend of Ashar or Y'ashar'al from Syria to Saba & Yemen. [If you do your homework you will see how Libyans, during this 2nd Intermediate Period, influence Saba and the Sabaean Language. Click This Link to See What I mean: https://www.facebook.com//pcb.166147525/1661473550763306/ ] So let me leave you with some simple reminder. 1st Kings ch.3 v.1, "Now Solomon made a treaty with Pharaoh King of Egypt, and married Pharaoh's daughter; then he brought her to the City of David until he had finished building his own house, and the house of the Lord, and the wall all around Jerusalem. Remember according to the scripture, the mythological Solomon could not build a temple in Jerusalem unless he had this treaty in which he married the daughter of the Pharaoh, which happened to be the only Woman his God found acceptable. [In, 1st Kings ch. 11 v.1-2, "King Solomon loved many foreign women, as well as the daughter of Pharaoh: [Women of the Moabites, Ammonites, Edomites, Sidonians, and Hittites - from the nations of whom the Lord had said to the children on Israel, "You shall not intermarry with them, not they with you. Surely they will turn away your hearts after their gods."] The fact of the matter is, No Pharaoh ever made mention of any Hebrew Empire or Israelite Kingdom in their legacy or records. However, remember the 'Bull God' Ba'al aka GebEL. Now remember, Nubian Pharaoh Piye ruled from the Napata region of GebEL Barkal, Located in Nubia, where we find the GebEL Barkal Temple of Amun. In the bible, Ba'al is mentioned and described as a mere Idol of sin and terror, over and over and Moloch is another name for Ba'al. But much like Moloch is slandered in the bible, at the same exact time in Crete, the myth of Minotaur was born. A Myth of an evil half-man / half-Bull Headed Beast was created, to slander the Deity of the Africans who inhabited these regions. Minotaur is just Minoan-Taurus = Minotaur. [Even the Norse god, Thor is a version of Taurus. Loki & Thor based on Set & Ausar, and derives from Hathor. Hathor = Hethur = HetHeru = House of Heru. The Holy Cow, producer of the Milky Way, mother of the golden calf, with his bulls eye, Horus's scope, the Horoscope. Found in the ceiling of the temple of Hathor. Point being: Y'ASHAR'AL; Ashur-Assyria: ASR ASHERAH; Goddess: Cosmic Tree IsRaEL; Isis-Ishtar iSistar; Sirius Auset-Ra; Aramaic: AL - Latin: EL IsRaELite -(Assyrian Babylon + Graeco Roman) ___________ = Kushite 360 Righteous Knowledge 720 Wisdom of Self 1080 Knowledge of Universe, Universal Wisdom, Supreme Intuitive Logic

Who are the Moors? The name Moorish derives from the Kemetic name Mashwesh (also spelled Meshwesh). The Kemetyu generally shortened it to Ma (Mau or Maur/Moo...r). The Kemetic texts are explicit that Mashwesh/Meshwesh was land west of modern Libya. This would then be Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. This becomes confusing because modern Europeans try to use the term Libyan for all people west of Kemet. They do this intentionally to mislead the people into believing that the small group of Asiatic colonists that inhabited the coast of Modern Libya in the 13th-century bc, are ethnically the same as all Northwest Africans. However, archeaological evidence shows that the rest of Northwest Africa was still Afrakan, even the Libyan interior. In fact, the Afrakan race remained the dominate power of Northwest Afraka even as they embraced the Canaanite immigrants who began arriving in Tunisia around the 8th-century bc. This is because the Canaanites were primarily of the Afrakan race to begin with. The racial change of North Africa did not begin until after 150 bc and the Roman domination of Carthage. Even then, the Afrakans remained the largest demographic, though disempowered. They were increasingly oppressed when the Romans enforced Christianity on them, centuries later. It was for this reason that they willingly adopted Islam as a weapon against Romanization. In the 8th-century, these Meshwesh/Moorish descendants then took control of Spain and Portugal. However, this was not new, because their ancestors during the Carthaginian Empire also controlled Spain and Portugal. It must also be noted that the Moors early on established their own Islamic state and were not initially subject to Asiatic Arabs. Though mixing became heavily practiced after the 12th-century and a Almohad dynasty's approach of mixing with their conquered's princesses, the Moorish were still not as dominated by lightskin as they are today. It was not until the 17th-century and the Turkish domination of North Africa, that the Moorish elite became ethnically as pale as they are today. However, the indigenous Moors still remain a major part of the population, especially in Morocco and Mauritania. In Morocco, these indigenous Moors are called Gnawa. This name refers to Ghana, the Islamic name of the great West Afrakan empire that had dominated the Moorish Almoravids until 1080 ce. Thus the Gnawa are descendants of the Almoravid moors that ruled Northwest Africa and South West Europe.