1. Home /
  2. Legal service /
  3. Legal Services Advocates

Category



General Information

Locality: Vista, California

Phone: +1 619-732-1158



Address: 2152 University Dr, C-16 92083 Vista, CA, US

Website: www.legalservicesadvocates.com

Likes: 501

Reviews

Add review

Facebook Blog





Legal Services Advocates 16.11.2020

This is a must watch if you have any questions I can answer them. https://youtu.be/tAHWX2ECsrY

Legal Services Advocates 28.10.2020

MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH IN FEDERAL COURTS REFUSAL TO HOLD STATE COURTS ACCOUNTABLE This is for advanced advocates and victims who know what the Rooker-Feldman Doctrine is, and how frustrating it is to be hit with it in a federal court case. This US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decision is a crack in the Rooker-Feldman wall. Also the Colorado River and Younger cases/doctrines walls. ... Virtually anyone who has attempted to use a civil rights case in the federal courts to rectify state court corruption receives a summary dismissal based on a rote recital of Rooker-Feldman, Colorado River and Younger. Somehow, this guy got over the wall with a three-judge panel in the 3rd Circuit. This is now a controlling and citable case that theoretically could open the floodgates. https://drive.google.com//1mO1j4GpgSiKubjTWmsaZdx0mL6/view

Legal Services Advocates 18.10.2020

" Open Today " Spending Time in the Office Today If any of you need any Questions Answered.

Legal Services Advocates 11.10.2020

https://drive.google.com//1eMWMOyRygbSj1h0ZXtWe65FIa/view

Legal Services Advocates 01.10.2020

State Intervention in the Family: Making a Federal Case Out of It "This Article is based on the author's belief, which is not necessarily shared by the current Court, that litigants may be more successful in challenging child protection laws in federal rather than state court. This Article is not concerned primarily with substantive law but with procedural law. Rather than addressing the merits of a challenge to child protection... laws, this Article is concerned with how to get into federal court. A journey through the Court's obstacle course may prove instructive to lawyers struggling over how to avoid state court litigation entirely or how to preserve certain issues for lower federal court review." See more

Legal Services Advocates 23.09.2020

-- Local Government Liability Under 1983 -- Local governing bodies can be sued directly under 1983 for monetary, declaratory, or injunctive relief where the action that is alleged to be unconstitutional implements or executes a policy statement, ordinance, regulation, or decision officially adopted and promulgated by that body's officers. - in Repking v. Lokey, 2010 and 1,077 similar citations... "On the other hand, the language of 1983... compels the conclusion that Congress did not intend municipalities to be held liable unless action pursuant to official municipal policy of some nature caused a constitutional tort." - in Miller v. Dart, 2015 and 548 similar citations For a municipality to be liable under 1983, a plaintiff must prove that a municipal policy or custom was the "moving force [behind] the constitutional violation." - in OKONGO v. MINNEAPOLIS POLICE DEPARTMENT, 2010 and 327 similar citations Official capacity suits "generally represent only another way of pleading an action against an entity of which an officer is an agent." - in TRAVERSIE v. Starr, 2018 and 1,969 similar citations